Najnovije vijesti

What Is Shared Leadership in Law Enforcement

09/12/2022 | objavio Radio Gradačac

Police services, often filled with traditional methods, were historically hierarchically structured, with power largely concentrated in the hands of a privileged few and the masses knowing their place in the pecking order. In most cases, these organizations are based on the idea of a courageous, wise and solitary leader. But as the book “The Wisdom of Crowds” showed, the collective often knows more than any individual. Strict hierarchies limit performance, and the recent riots in Baltimore have shown that society pays a high price when policing goes wrong. As Police Chief Magazine points out, to remain relevant, modern law enforcement must flatten the hierarchy and create an environment of shared leadership. Why shared leadership? In light of recent headlines, law enforcement agencies across the country are struggling with low morale. So much so that new Attorney General Loretta Lynch has made it a priority to “improve police morale.” What is to blame for low morality? According to a 2012 report by Police Chief Magazine, low morale is not the result of local stress, but organizational pressure. Factors specifically included in the report include “patronage of directors, poor communication, unfair and inconsistent discipline, and oversight policies.” “The boss knows” – hierarchical leadership Shared leadership is more of a collaborative effort. One person is still responsible, but power and influence are shared within the group. This could mean that individuals have more autonomy in decisions related to their positions or an open-door policy where everyone`s ideas are fairly taken into account.

“The best examples of shared leadership are when decision-making is spread across multiple people,” said Greg A. Chung-Yan, a professor in the department of psychology at the University of Windsor in Ontario, Canada. The researchers found that too often, police leadership “reinvents the challenge of legitimizing one`s preferred response,” where it should instead rely on police leadership to evaluate and ultimately make better judgments through “shared leadership.” This study characterizes public policy situations as “complicated” rather than simple situations, both of which are part of a hierarchical leadership model that often fails the most in a complex situation. The degree of complexity is such that simple conclusions and cause-and-effect solutions are not always possible. Many people think they have common leadership when there are teams. While this breaks the hierarchy, it`s not really joint leadership. Within a team, there is usually still a team leader; Even if there is no team leader, shared power is only relevant in the context of the team and is not applied more broadly to the entire company. Shared leadership differs from the traditional style of vertical hierarchy management. In the vertical leadership style, those in leadership positions are responsible for most decision-making, while those in subordinate roles have little influence on the decision-making process. Shared leadership has significant benefits for members of the organization and the company as a whole.

It improves employee engagement and job satisfaction, and enables the company to adapt faster to change and develop new and innovative ideas. What have been some of the benefits of shared leadership in law enforcement? Describe some of the benefits and describe how this power-sharing agreement can help make effective policing decisions, both administratively and locally. For small businesses, joint leadership could be as simple as creating a meeting format where employees talk about how ideas differ and there`s agreement, rather than discussing which idea is best, Collins said. Shared leadership has a positive influence on the functioning of a company, as this model promotes and values initiative. When employees feel empowered to do what they know they need to do, rather than waiting to be told, productivity and job satisfaction increase. And when employees are satisfied, the company operates more easily in a positive environment. How shared leadership works: The 4 necessary conditions – new research teams can be a good place to introduce joint leadership into building a corporate culture. Teams offer smaller containers and can provide employees with experience within a leadership structure.

According to a study by the Academy of Management Journal, the team should already have a consistent environment with well-understood goals and a strong atmosphere of mutual support for shared leadership to work in a team environment. Although research on this intervention is ongoing, the results are promising, with one executive saying in an interview about one of her seminars on shared leadership: “It was a group of imperfect individuals who came together to do extraordinary things with other imperfect individuals. not perfect. It`s surprising how willing people are to share this. Shared leadership may be a relatively new concept in the business world, but it can be seen as far back as the Roman Empire, where individuals came together to share power with their counterparts in the Senate and give the people a voice the emperor had to listen to. The quickest and easiest way to create a shared leadership environment is to give law enforcement agencies the opportunity to make suggestions and offer information freely. While ultimate decision-making authority generally remains in the hands of management, officials in this system are free to express their ideas at all levels. This shared leadership approach is an effective, low-risk method of engaging employees in the day-to-day operations of a police service. This allows people to feel valued by their agencies and gives them an interest in the operation. However, this type of shared leadership is not necessarily a strength in many police services. The article recommends that police chiefs focus on formal employee suggestion software to create the right communication channels.

In such a system, police chiefs are tasked with asking more questions instead of giving answers, listening more than saying and supporting rather than leading. Because routine tasks are delegated to employees, the boss can draw attention to major threats and opportunities. When an organization`s employees are empowered, everyone benefits. The concept of shared leadership has existed for decades when it comes to the business sector. However, this concept is relatively new in terms of implementation in law enforcement agencies. Many believe that the executive division imposes measures on many senior managers within the scope of the agency`s control. Again, it is believed that this can lead to internal conflicts between managers and confusion among employees. Below, we will define and discuss some of the benefits of shared leadership in law enforcement and some of the benefits that this power-sharing agreement can help. They say a sign of strength is to admit your mistakes.

The police, like many professions, are not always very good at doing this and allowing themselves to see that they are imperfect. As with many professionals, their identity is contained in knowing what they are doing and doing it well. In the face of failure, there is often denial, refutation and misunderstanding. Did you know? Shared leadership is just a management theory that small business owners should be aware of. Other management theories include administrative management, bureaucratic management, and scientific management. All by-products of a rigid hierarchy. As in other organizations, low morale leads to increased sales and decreased productivity. But perhaps most importantly: “As morale declines, violence and civil grievances increase. Officers with low morale have lower tolerance, may exercise poor judgment and show negative feelings, which can be detrimental to their duty.

“What happens when power is more distributed than in a common leadership program? In 2006, the Broken Arrow Police Department in Oklahoma experimented with shared leadership, finding that it improved “engagement, pride, morale, motivation, productivity, leadership development, and acceptance of community policing initiatives.” Instead of a lonely heroic figure, the police of the future revolves around teamwork. These organizations will be flatter, with fewer levels of management and distinction. Decision-making will be more inclusive and responsive to community needs. “Teams with shared leadership have less conflict, more consensus, more trust, and more cohesion than teams without shared leadership,” wrote Peter Northouse in his book Leadership: Theory and Practice (Sage Publications, 2015). There are three basic principles for creating shared leadership: For local leaders, this could be quite scary as they have to take on more responsibility. For leaders, it`s also scary, because they have to give more responsibility to their subordinates. The document states that “exploration and shared leadership thrive in an environment that: Police must become better able to handle complex situations. This requires a leadership concept called “ambidexterity.” This is described by the researchers as “the ability to both `run the business` (using existing practices to become increasingly effective and efficient) and `change the business` (exploring new opportunities and innovations)”. to emphasize the fact that no one can have all the answers.

Comments are closed.